Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Federal Government Charges Wal-Mart With Labor Violations

The National Labor Relations Board claimed that the retail chain has fired and punished employees for participating in legally protected activities.


Federal officials have charged Wal-Mart with a formal complaint, claiming that they fired, disciplined, or threatened more than 60 employees for participating in legally protected activities to complain about wages and working conditions, according to AP.


Federal officials have charged Wal-Mart with a formal complaint, claiming that they fired, disciplined, or threatened more than 60 employees for participating in legally protected activities to complain about wages and working conditions, according to AP .


A man chants outside Walmart during a protest for better wages and working conditions.


Stephen Lam / Reuters / Reuters


Protests were organized in 2012 by union-backed group OUR Wal Mart, an organization that has spent years pressing the company to increase wages, benefits, and make it easier for workers to organize a union.


Protests were organized in 2012 by union-backed group OUR Wal Mart, an organization that has spent years pressing the company to increase wages, benefits, and make it easier for workers to organize a union.


A demonstrator prepares to be handcuffed as she is detained for civil disobedience outside Walmart.


Stephen Lam / Reuters


The National Labor Relations Board’s general counsel laid out similar charges in November, but waited in attempt to settle with Wal-Mart, which it failed to do.


The National Labor Relations Board’s general counsel laid out similar charges in November, but waited in attempt to settle with Wal-Mart, which it failed to do.


Stephen Lam / Reuters


If the retail giant doesn’t respond by Jan. 28, the case will go before an administrative law judge. The company could be forced to give workers back pay, reinstatement, and reverse any disciplinary action if they are found liable.


If the retail giant doesn’t respond by Jan. 28, the case will go before an administrative law judge. The company could be forced to give workers back pay, reinstatement, and reverse any disciplinary action if they are found liable.


Stephen Lam / Reuters




View Entire List ›


No comments:

Post a Comment